Tag Archives: Search Engine Optimisation

panda-penguin-pigeon

What is SEO? A 20 minute presentation

This short presentation was originally created to be presented to a selection of clients who, like many other people I talk to, were having a hard time understanding why SEO is important and why it’s not simply a one-off process. The presentation lasted approximately 20 minutes and aimed to answer the simple question ‘What is SEO’ in a way that clients with little digital marketing knowledge would understand.

Slide 1: What is SEO?

Before jumping straight in ask yourself the question “what does SEO mean to me?”. It’ll likely be slightly different to the person you’re sitting next to. Some think it’s all about making money through Google, others a way of shouting about your brand online. Other’s think it’s simply black magic. With the exception of the third suggestion, you’re probably on the right lines.

The truth is, SEO is a combination of technical computer knowledge and creative content marketing, all with the aim of getting more people to visit your website through increased exposure in search engine result pages, known as SERPs. Let’s take a look at an example SERP.

Slide 2: An example Search Engine Result Page (SERP)

In the example SERP the question ‘What is SEO?’ has been asked. Google, in 0.82 seconds has reviewed over 153 million pages which have some relation to that term and returned the best ones in its organic results. However, the best result from Google’s calculations isn’t the top result.The top result in the SERP is RankingCoach.com – A paid advert. The second result, 123-reg.co.uk is also a paid advert. These adverts compete in their own way, and are still affected by the quality of a website, but often appear above organic results.

So why not just pay to be top of Google? Well, other than cost, here’s one reason that you need to compete in the organic space:

Search engine users overwhelmingly click on organic results on Google and Bing by a margin of 94 percent to 6 percent. That’s according to new research from GroupM UK and Nielsen, published today by eConsultancy, based on a sample of 1.4 billion searches conducted by 28 million UK citizens in June 2011.

An article by Search Engine Watch

So, the top organic result is in-fact SearchEngineLand.com. However, in the example there’s also a quote from Wikipedia appearing above the top organic result. This is a relatively recent move from Google to answer questions directly without the need to leave the SERP at all. This is known as ‘knowledge graph’.

Slide 3: The definition of SEO

So it’s safe to assume that if Google’s knowledge graph is returning that statement to the query “What is SEO?” then that’s a pretty good place to start.

“The process of affecting the visibility of a website in a search engine’s unpaid results.”

Visibility is the key here: It’s not nececerily about sales, brand awareness or anything else (although they’re often very closely correlated). It’s simply about how visible a website is within the unpaid results of a search engine. This has always been true of SEO – But the process itself has changed significantly over the years.

In mordern SEO, it’s no longer about sticking as many keywords onto a page as possible, or simply getting as many links to your site. Modern SEO requires us to think about the people, too. Good SEO and a great user experience go hand-in-hand, and it’s long been Google’s ultimate ambition to deliver the best possible experience.

Slide 4: The focus of good SEO

Google’s mantra, “Focus on the user and all else will follow”, is a smart one. If people have a good expereince then they’ll more likely return. That increases the amount of searches being made, which consuquently means more ads being shown (remember those paid ads?). Ultimately, a better internet experience means more money for Google. And let’s not forget, it’s a pretty morally solid approach to take, too!

By delivering the best results, showing the best content and recommending the best experience to people searching on Google, people are more likely to leave with what they needed and come back when they need the answer to something else. So how does Google know which websites best meet these criteria?

Slide 5: Google’s algorithms

Google, like every other search engine, runs on complex algorithms which are computer programs that aim to return the best results as quickly as possible. There’s three algorithms in perticular which have had a lot of exposure to the SEO world in recent times.

Panda

The Panda algorithm focused on content, in perticular quality and uniqueness. If I’d taken my content for this article from another presentation, for example, it’d be Panda’s job to identify that and make sure the original source got the best score.

Penguin

Penguin shook up the SEO community with its arrival, focusing on the links that are made between websites. Links should be recommendations to other sources of information, so links from dodgy websites should be avoided or removed.

Pigeon

Pigeon’s job is to make sure that local businesses and store locations are given more exposure in search engine results for local searches. These can be explicit (eg. “Shoe shop in Nottingham”) or inferred (eg. “Shoe shop near me”).

Each algorithm that Google uses takes various signals from websites. These signals, or clues, are used to derermin which websites have the best content.

Slide 6: SEO signals

Signals or clues are the things that search engine optimisers try to strengthen and make sure Google is aware of. Whilst not all of the 200+ signals are known, lots of SEO agencies and websites have done thorough research. Copy, content, links, technical elements and social media all have correlations with search presence.

In modern SEO high quality content is a focus point as it not only provides a substantial amount of content to Google but also receives links and social awareness if done well.

Slide 7: The periodic table of SEO

The periodic table of SEO success factors, produced by SearchEngineLand.com, shows some of the signals that make a successful SEO campaign. The infographic is a great example of content in itself, receiving lots of attention on social media and discussion (plus links) on relevant websites.

From the table you can see that there’s positive and negative factors, and signals work together to increase liklihood of success. There’s also on-the-page and off-the-page SEO, which we’ll go into next.

Slide 8: The four corners of SEO

SEO can be split into on-page and off-page, as well as technical and creative.

On-page vs off-page

On-page refers to anything that takes place on your own website. For example this may be changing the code of your website or amending the wording on a page. In comparison, Off-page relates to anything that doesn’t happen on your own site, but rather someone elses. This includes links to your site and articles on other websites.

Technical vs creative

Technical elements of SEO are concerned primerily with code and links; These are the scientific parts of SEO and relate closely to website development. Creative aspects of SEO include content creation and marketing. These are focused on copywriting, web design and being able to build relationships with influencers.

These two views of SEO produce four unique areas, each of which focuses on different princibles.

  • On-page technical: Your site’s user experience
  • Off-page technical: Websites linking to your site
  • On-page creative: Great, unique & relevant content
  • Off-page creative: Markeitng your content to the right people

Despite being different in their approach, they are closely related and reliant on one-another in order to see real benefit.

Slide 9: User experience (On-page technical)

Google has been increasing its expectations of websites user experience in recent times, with the Summer 2015 mobile-friendly update demonstrating that mobile user experience is more important than ever before. User experience covers the entire experience whilst on your website, regardless of device. This includes the time it takes pages to load, the way that content is structured and how your website scales to different screen sizes.

Content structure

When we talk about content structure, we can refer to two things. The first is the way that pages are related to each other. This is commonly known as information architecture. For example, on a gifting website it may make more sense to order your pages by recipient (eg. For him, for her), rather than price (Under £20, £21 – £30).

The second meaning of content structure is how content is written on the page. Each page should have a heading, sub-headings and annotated images to make sure that Google can quickly scan and make sense of a single web-page’s content. This is done through HTML using heading tags, and is just the tip of the iceberg for on-page SEO.

Slide 10: Links (Off-page technical)

Knowing how to handle the links (recommendations) coming from other websites to yours (called a ‘backlink profile’) and take required action makes up a large part of the off-site technical quarter. Again, in modern SEO we shouldn’t be paying (or even really asking!) for links back to a website, but relying on people wanting to naturally share the content that we’re putting online. Whilst this isn’t always strictly true, you should never pay (in money, chocolate, love or anything else!) for links.

Not all links are created equal. The higher quality a website that links to you, the better the result. For example, a link from BBC.co.uk, a highly respected and authoritative website, is a much better recommendation than one from a small blog (Although there’s room for high quality links from blogs, too!).

Some sites can be a little dodgy, probably because of some bad or out-of-date SEO. Receiving links from sites such as this can negatively affect your ranking in Google’s results and should be flagged to Google. Once flagged (known as disavowing) these links should no longer affect your rank.

Slide 11: Content (On-page creative)

Here’s where it gets fun! On-page creative covers any creative assets that appear on your site. These can include the copy and images that make it onto your product page, or the large infographic that you produce showing product popularity across the globe. Whatever the content, it should always be great, unique and relevant.

Great is not the end goal, it’s the entry-point!

Rand Fishkin of Moz (A super-awesome SEO agency in LA, USA) recently discussed the “Great, unique and relevant content” conundrum in a video. In it, he explains that due to the increasing competition from the increasing amount of content, “great” is simply the entry-point to SEO success. In reality, the content you produce should always be at least the best peice of content you can find on the subject, whilst aiming for 10x better!

Slide 12: Types of content

The guys over at SmartInsights produced a very cool infographic to demonstrate the different types of content and how they can be utilised for different purposes. I wrote an in-depth article on the content marketing matrix previously which is worth checking out.

Slide 13: Content marketing (Off-site creative)

So you’ve created the most amazing peice of content on the internet, now what? Well, the ultimate goal is always to get picked up naturally, but more often than not you need to part-take in a process called “content marketing”.

What is content marketing?

Content marketing is the process of talking to people to inform them of your amazing content. It can be done by talking directly to your audience, or by talking to people that your audience follow and listen to. The people that your audience follow are known as influencers, and they’re often targeted as they’re much more likely to produce a link to your content than someone in your audience.

But remember, you shouldn’t be asking for links. So how do you stand the best chance of getting one? That’s where relationship building comes into play: Building relationships with influencers means they’ll be much more likely to want to share your content when you let them know about it!

Digital PR in an SEO strategy?

Including digital PR in your outreach efforts is garunteed to give better results, and is mutually beneficial for both your digital and PR teams. You’re much more likely to get those high quality links you’ve been after, and it’s free, brand-building and engaging content for your PR team to talk about.

Slide 14: Take-away points

So, hopefully that gives an overview of SEO in 2015. There’s a few take-away points worth remembering;

  • Google’s algorithms change, so keeping up-to-date is important.
  • Content marketing is essential and best practice in modern SEO.
  • There’s many signals to consider, which fall under a number of categories.
  • SEO is a “creative science” which includes technical knowledge and creative flare.
  • Great is only the point of entry, not the goal.

And most importantly;

  • Focus on the user and all else will follow.
linkbuilding

Reviewing the rules of link building

Link building has become an increasingly dirty word over the last couple of weeks, months and years (depending how far back you look), and many digital marketers have began to simply ‘leave the court’ when it comes to the once quick-win strategy. This became particularly clear during Nottingham’s first ‘Drink: Digital marketing meet-up’ event late last month.

During the event, which brought together many of Nottingham’s digitally inclined minds, there was an overwhelming buzz around Google’s site-wide penalties applied through the now apparently nasty practice of link building. But is it really fair to assume that all link building results in site-wide penalties? And should digital marketers give up on the practice all together?

Over at Moz they seem to disagree (and I’m with them). Last Friday they released their weekly whiteboard Friday discussing ‘The rules of link building’. Cyrus Shepard used a brilliant analogy, comparing link building to a game of basketball. He considered Google to be the referee, giving people fouls and penalties. Some players (digital marketers) are getting frustrated and simply walking off the court (stopping link building all-together). As Shepard explains, link building is still a huge part of Google’s algorithm, and people are stopping because they don’t know the rules.

Whilst Cyrus goes on to explain five do’s and don’ts (which you should totally listen to) I’m going to sum it up in two words…

…’Be natural’

By ‘be natural’ I mean don’t try to scale up a natural link building exercise. Stick to the low quantity but high quality links that might take six to twelve months to develop – These are the types of link that Google won’t punish. Scaling this up will quickly become black hat SEO (in Google’s eyes, at least). Not asking for specifics (particularly anchor text) in your process will keep the process as natural as possible. Don’t forget Google’s strapline: “Don’t be evil”. Keep to this mantra and I predict there will be no site-wide penalties in sight.

A great way to stay natural is to focus on content distribution. By getting your content out to more people not only will you generate more natural links but you’ll also get your content viewed by more people, which is the end goal anyway. It’s also beneficial as you’ll receive higher quantity traffic (note quantity not quality) as the links to your site will be more relevant.

So, stay on the court and follow the rules – Not only for today’s game but tomorrow’s game too. After all, it’s good to win the game, but even better to win the tournament.

guestBlogging

Is guest blogging still valuable in 2014?

I recently read Matt Cutts article on the decay and fall of guest blogging for SEO whilst searching for the effectiveness of the practice. It seems that there’s still potential for guest blogging, but it’s been exploited by many trying to achieve some SEO quick wins (namely getting as many backlinks to a website as possible).

The good – High quality, worthwhile and relevant articles

The general vibe from the SEO community seems to be that there is still potential for guest blogging, despite Google coming down hard on some of the ‘looser’ practices (and rightly so!). It really comes down to the quality of the article, and the quality of the website that you’re publishing on.

Articles written by thought-leaders and industry experts, which delve deep into the topics being discussed is a good first step to ensuring a good quality article. The article should be of high-enough quality to ensure it’s engaging and detailed enough to make people want to read the whole article (and add comments!). But it’s also about the relationship of the author with the guest blog site’s readership.

The article also needs to be relevant to the publisher’s site. A shorter, topical article will go much further than a long, irrelevant one. The quality of the site comes into play here too, with the “take anything” attitude sites falling foul of Google’s expectations. Why would you want to be associated with those sites?

The bad – Paid for links, spammy articles and keyword saturation

Paying for links, keyword saturated anchor text and non-influential articles are just three examples of poor guest blogging. As Matt Cutts demonstrates, there has definitely been a significant increase in the quantity of bad quality *spammy* guest blogs.

Ultimately, if you’re guest blogging in an attempt to get lots of keyword rich links back to your site, then you should probably consider stopping. Matt suggests in the article comments that adding ‘Nofollow’ is a good tactic, meaning the links won’t effect (negatively or otherwise) PageRank. That in itself doesn’t make the article useless – not by any means.

The ugly – Blog spinning and replicated content

And then things get really bad. Blog spinning (the practice of submitting a slightly varied article to 100’s of blogging directories at the same time) is, quite obviously, going to attract Google’s attention. As will submitting the same guest article to multiple sites. No longer are the blogs unique and of a high value!

So, is guest blogging still valuable in 2014?

From everything I’ve read – Yes. But not so much for increasing PageRank (though backlinks, at least). It seems that due to the increase of spammy articles emerging since 2012 Google has took a tough stance and has devalued those backlinks. That’s not to say that guest blogging isn’t a good practice, simply that it shouldn’t be seen as a ‘quick win’ to get links back to the site and ultimately increase PageRank.

What I (and Matt Cutts) is trying to say is that “Guest blogging is OK – for exposure, branding, increased reach, community, etc – but Guest blogging for SEO is not”.

GooglePenguin

What changed with Penguin 2.0?

Penguin 2.0 was released less than a week ago, and seemed to underwhelm a lot of webmasters despite the hype that surrounded it, despite being spam focused thus effecting a small number of (black hat) website administrators.

What changes were likely rolled out?

There’s a couple of likely updates included with Penguin 2.0. The main one, as discussed in WebmasterHelp’s YouTube channel was the improvements in finding ‘black hat’ web spam, and reducing the ranking of those results. This was in attempt to create a more comprehensive spam detection algorithm, which has more impact on ‘spammy’ websites.

Another key change (probably) implemented with Penguin 2.0 is the management of adverts (both text and display), in order to detect the associated flow of pagerank. Webmasterhelp’s video discusses the ‘obviousness’ that paid adverts should adopt, ensuring that users don’t think paid ads are organic content.

What’s in the pipeline for Google’s SEO algorithms?

There’s three key elements described in the YouTube video;

  • A new link analysis system orientated at better detecting content hidden behind links
  • A ‘next generation’ hacked website detection system, with the focus on user communication
  • Increasing the pagerank of ‘authority’ websites for individual industries and categories.

Of cause, this is all ‘things that have had some sign of approval’ (as mentioned in the disclaimer of webmasterhelp’s video) so it’s entirely possible, knowing the ‘fingers-in-pies’ approach that Google takes, that these may or may not make it into final releases in the summer/s to follow.